They are in fact similar I skimmed that other companies data. I think CLN is better, Why? Because they use the heat activated lyposomes. These are what CLN refers to as smart bombs. Basically it is a ball of fat. However it is a ball of fat in the form a cell normally consumes (more or less). So the cells gobble them up. The cancer cells consume more fluid especially since they may be dividing wildly or have a plan to do so in the near future. By addind drugs to these little fat balls. Individual cancer cells are spoon fed their poison. By the way thes fat balls can be whipped up in a beaker. A very simple and effective vector. At least if compared to, say one of the 200+ monoclonal antibodies that might work. Heat activated liposome are a cinch. I don't know exactly what heat activated means but the researches seam quite sure this stuff works. If this doesn't help feel free to disregard.