Have the longs here really digested what Adam F said in his article? For Thermodox to succeed would be a complete break from past studies bro. RFA and Thermodox would have to accomplish results that RFA and chemo could not deliver at all in the past. You would have to go from failure to great success with only a nanometer of fat greasing the way. Sound too good to be true? Everyone loves a long shot, but you gotta take a shot of TRUTH when you decide how much to bet on that pony..
No doubt bro. People need to stick to the SCIENCE. Longs on this board skew their views with all this talk of $333 and ducts and tiny phase I trials and never look objectively at the SCIENCE that will decide the outcome of the trial. Dismissing years of failure and expecting success based on no prior evidence? A nice box of Christmas TRUTH for y'all. Sorry I didn't have time to wrap it but I gotta lot to spread and no magic sleigh.
Not really a long shot at all if you understood the science. But you don't, or you pretend that you don't. Either way, please keep selling your shares to me if you are finally off of the simulator at the JC.