CNBC is DISGUSTING. They have Greenberg on there right now. He was right about NFLX and argues with Cramer. Why won't they mention that Cramer said buy it around 300 when it's at 86 right now?
Hmmm. Let's see.
Intel was $20.28 and ARMH was $27.76 back then.
Intel is now 21% higher while ARMH is slightly lower.
Cramer may like Intel now, after admitting that he was wrong for listening to James Covello. But he did not like Intel when it made more sense to like it.
Thanks Paul. I didn't even bother to reply to that other guy again. He either has a man crush on Cramer or is a relative of Cramer's.
It's very clear that he was pumping NFLX and I've watched him argue with Herb Greenberg a few months ago that it was a great stock when Herb said he wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole. Cramer is disgusting filth and I very highly doubt he has any real friends in life.
How much more disgusting can this guy's recommendations get?
You're absolutely right.
He pretty much sold the stock to his listeners. It was pretty clear that he said this is an opportunity to buy the stock and was pretty clear that he does not think they will lose subscribers.
Almost a million cancelled. Now his so called colleuges at Fast Money are telling everyone to jump ship at $85. So CNBC's advice is once again, "buy high and sell low". Interesting?
At least Intel is the real deal here. I would never touch anything Cramer or any of his buddies suggest.
He11, he said it might even be CHEAP in this article back with it was well over 250.....this past July!
LMAO! What a GOON! Is he gonna reimburse all the poor fools and little old ladies that listened to his dumb a$$????