% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Intel Corporation Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • williamdavis960 williamdavis960 Nov 17, 2012 10:20 AM Flag

    ARM to host Technology Symposium

    Why are you always pumping armh on the INTC board? Nobody cares about or wants arms inferior technology.

    Sentiment: Buy

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • "Why are you always pumping armh on the INTC board? "

      To show the naive it's more than just about the fabs...

      "Nobody cares about or wants arms inferior technology."

      Apparently, the rest of the world does... have you compared ARMH vs INTC...

      • 2 Replies to getanid61
      • I have now run along & go pump your gossip & lies over on the armh board boy, this is the INTC board.

        Sentiment: Buy

      • 'have you compared ARMH vs INTC'

        Over the lifetime of both companies, INTC has to date gone up 3 times as much although often it is a lot more as ARMH is more sensitive to speculation, fashion and unexpected earnings/forecasts.;range=my;compare=armh;indicator=volume;charttype=area;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=off;source=undefined;

        'To show the naive it's more than just about the fabs...'

        Fabs are a sideshow, its great designs that make Intel what it is. AMD once had Fabs but without great designs it could not afford to keep them.

        On a more general point the reason you generate animosity here is because you have a trolling style purposely designed to provoke like a subtle version of daysofshred. Everybody here knows that ARMH is artificially pumped by the same #$%$ myths that are keeping INTC down out of all proportion to respective P/Es and they don't need reminding of this great iniquity by you. Nothing wrong in posting relevant comparative ARM vs x86 processor information but really what is the point of generic ARM PRs like this one here which have no INTC implications ? They can be read on the ARMH board.

        ARM64 is not going to be a competitor to x86-64 in the server world, it's too underpowered by ARM's own numbers, it will just allow ARM software to handle more than 4 GB application space which it needs to do eventually. So there is no need to trumpet it every other post as if it will make a material difference to INTC because it won't just like everyone told you WinRT would be a bust which you have been trumpeting for years now as a major catalyst for NVDA and ARMH. To disrupt an incumbent processor with a legacy software base you need something like a factor of 2 performance differential, ARM hasn't got that even in performance/power against LV Xeons or Atoms.

32.08-0.270(-0.83%)Apr 24 4:00 PMEDT