Sat, Jul 12, 2014, 4:36 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Intel Corporation Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • getanid61 getanid61 Nov 17, 2012 10:34 AM Flag

    ARM to host Technology Symposium

    "Why are you always pumping armh on the INTC board? "

    To show the naive it's more than just about the fabs...

    "Nobody cares about or wants arms inferior technology."

    Apparently, the rest of the world does... have you compared ARMH vs INTC...

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • I have now run along & go pump your gossip & lies over on the armh board boy, this is the INTC board.

      Sentiment: Buy

    • 'have you compared ARMH vs INTC'

      Over the lifetime of both companies, INTC has to date gone up 3 times as much although often it is a lot more as ARMH is more sensitive to speculation, fashion and unexpected earnings/forecasts.

      http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=INTC+Interactive#symbol=intc;range=my;compare=armh;indicator=volume;charttype=area;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=off;source=undefined;

      'To show the naive it's more than just about the fabs...'

      Fabs are a sideshow, its great designs that make Intel what it is. AMD once had Fabs but without great designs it could not afford to keep them.

      On a more general point the reason you generate animosity here is because you have a trolling style purposely designed to provoke like a subtle version of daysofshred. Everybody here knows that ARMH is artificially pumped by the same #$%$ myths that are keeping INTC down out of all proportion to respective P/Es and they don't need reminding of this great iniquity by you. Nothing wrong in posting relevant comparative ARM vs x86 processor information but really what is the point of generic ARM PRs like this one here which have no INTC implications ? They can be read on the ARMH board.

      ARM64 is not going to be a competitor to x86-64 in the server world, it's too underpowered by ARM's own numbers, it will just allow ARM software to handle more than 4 GB application space which it needs to do eventually. So there is no need to trumpet it every other post as if it will make a material difference to INTC because it won't just like everyone told you WinRT would be a bust which you have been trumpeting for years now as a major catalyst for NVDA and ARMH. To disrupt an incumbent processor with a legacy software base you need something like a factor of 2 performance differential, ARM hasn't got that even in performance/power against LV Xeons or Atoms.

      • 1 Reply to marsavian
      • "ARMH is more sensitive to speculation, fashion "

        Hmmm...if I was to assume that you're right...
        then there's nothing wrong with being fashionable...

        "Fabs are a sideshow, its great designs that make Intel what it is."

        It was also the Windows cash cow...I hope you don't discount that...
        But there are only a few here who get that it's more than just about the fabs...

        "On a more general point the reason you generate animosity here is because you have a trolling style purposely designed to provoke like a subtle version of daysofshred."

        You had tons of animosity on other boards...
        In your day, you had the most combative of styles...
        You participated in the biggest doozies I've ever seen on other boards...
        On this board, it's mainly just one poster with multiple ids...
        In fact, you marked one of his ids for extinction as I recall...

        "Everybody here knows that ARMH is artificially pumped"

        DIsagree !!!!!!

        "but really what is the point of generic ARM PRs"

        For the naive who think it's all about the fabs...

        "ARM64 is not going to be a competitor to x86-64"

        OH...time will tell...:)

 
INTC
31.25-0.01(-0.03%)Jul 11 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.