% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

ENERQ.PK Message Board

  • ecd_anonymous ecd_anonymous Jan 20, 2006 12:03 AM Flag

    The New 'Sputnik' - Friedman

    January 20, 2006
    Op-Ed Columnist
    Behind the New 'Sputnik' Challenges: They All Run on Oil


    I came to Detroit looking for the hottest new American cars. Instead, I found Sputnik.

    You remember Sputnik - the little satellite the Soviets launched in 1957. The Eisenhower administration was so stunned it put the U.S. into a crash program to train more scientists and engineers so America could catch up with the Russians in the space race.

    Well, for anyone paying attention, our generation's Sputnik showed up at the annual Detroit auto show this week. It's not a satellite. It's a car. It's called the Geely 7151 CK sedan. It seats a family of five, gets good mileage and will cost around $10,000 when it goes on sale in 2008.

    It's made in China.

    That doesn't get your attention? Well, there's another Sputnik that just went up: Iran. It's going to make a nuclear bomb, no matter what the U.N. or U.S. says, because at $60-a-barrel oil, Tehran's mullahs are rich enough to buy off or tell off the rest of the world. That doesn't worry you? Well, there's a quieter Sputnik orbiting Earth. It's called climate change - a k a Katrina and melting glaciers.

    What am I saying here? I am saying that our era doesn't have a single Sputnik to grab our attention and crystallize the threat to our security and way of life in one little steel ball - the way our parents' era did. But that doesn't mean such threats don't exist. They do, and they have a single common denominator: the way we use and consume energy today, particularly oil.

    Friends, we are in the midst of an energy crisis - but this is not your grandfather's energy crisis. No, this is something so much bigger, for four reasons.

    First, we are in a war against a radical, violent stream of Islam that is fueled and funded by our own energy purchases. We are financing both sides in the war on terrorism: the U.S. Army with our tax dollars, and Islamist charities, madrasas and terrorist organizations through our oil purchases.

    Second, the world has gotten flat, and three billion new players from India, China and the former Soviet Union just walked onto the field with their version of the American dream: a house, a car, a toaster and a refrigerator. If we don't quickly move to renewable alternatives to fossil fuels, we will warm up, smoke up and choke up this planet far faster than at any time in the history of the world. Katrina will look like a day at the beach.


    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Mr Friedman really put it right. The only thing I think he should have put a big emphasis on hydrogen energy. I feel that is the real key to the world's energy. Hydrogen in use by Internal Combustion Engines or by the use of Fuel Cells.

    • Friedman has become about as influential as they get. In the late 80s early 90s the talk was how Japan was going to buy the America and our days as the world's economic superpower was over (at B school we spent our classes studying the Japanese model of business as the way of teh future( ...then from the horizon came Microsoft, Cisco, Dell, etc. Now the talk is how China is going to end our economic dominance and on the horizon Stan is charging forward with ENER to bring forth a company that will ensure we retain our status. We will one day wonder how we survived on oil and not hybrids as sure as we wonder how salesmen sold without fax machines, email and cellphones. We just celebrated Ben Franklin's 300 birthday. My guess is the world will one day celebrate Stan's 300th as well.

      • 1 Reply to capeandkeys
      • I too have read "The WOrld is Flat" by Friedman and I also highly recommend "the Party's Over" by Richard Heinberg for a take on PEAK OIL!! If you do not know about peak oil, then you havent done your DD when it comes to investing and overall awareness of the global situation. That is why i am heavily invested in energy and alternative energy stocks, ie - ENER. Anyway, raising awareness among the general public may be the only way to save this great nation before it is too late.


    • Third, because of the above, green energy-saving technologies and designs - for cars, planes, homes, appliances or office buildings - will be one of the biggest industries of the 21st century. Tell your kids. China is already rushing down this path because it can't breathe and can't grow if it doesn't reduce its energy consumption. Will we dominate the green industry, or will we all be driving cars from China, Japan and Europe?

      Finally, if we continue to depend on oil, we are going to undermine the whole democratic trend that was unleashed by the fall of the Berlin Wall. Because oil will remain at $60 a barrel and will fuel the worst regimes in the world - like Iran - to do the worst things for the world. Indeed, this $60-a-barrel boom in the hands of criminal regimes, and just plain criminals, will, if sustained, pose a bigger threat to democracies than communism or Islamism. It will be a black tide that turns back the democratic wave everywhere - including in Iraq.

      The one thing we can do now to cope with all four of these trends is to create a tax that fixes the pump price at $3.50 to $4 a gallon - no matter where the OPEC price goes. Because if consumers know that the price of oil is never coming down, they will change their behavior. And when consumers change their behavior in a big way, G.M., Ford and DaimlerChrysler will change their cars in a big way, and it is cars and trucks that consume the vast majority of the world's oil.

      The more Detroit goes green, the faster it will be propelled down the innovation curve, making it more likely that Detroit - and not Toyota or Honda or the Chinese - will dominate the green technologies of the 21st century. A permanent gasoline tax will also make solar, wind and biofuels so competitive with oil that it will drive their innovations as well.

      George Bush may think he is preserving the American way of life by rejecting a gasoline tax. But if he does not act now - starting with his State of the Union speech - he will be seen as the man who presided over the decline of our way of life. He will be the American president who ignored the Sputniks of our day.