Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

ENERQ.PK Message Board

  • Ray_Bowman Ray_Bowman Mar 16, 2011 11:31 AM Flag

    Nuclear Re-evaluation is a Must

    Has this link been posted before? It makes some undeniable points clearly -- especially, see the comments highlighted with added ***s. While safety is a major issue, so is financing. Also, eventual disposal of radioactive waste is more than just a nagging problem, it is a major issue. And, until this issue is resolved -- and the costs factored into the financing commitments -- governments should not push for nuclear generating plants.

    If good sense prevails (chancy, I know), we will see further-increased governmental support for PV investments, worldwide.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/mar/15/japan-nuclear-explosion-energy-renewables

    <<<Other analysts said they expected confidence in nuclear power to drop significantly as it did in the aftermath of other major accidents. Political confidence took at least three years to recover after the partial core meltdown in Unit 2 of the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the accident slowed growth, but led to a large number of new safety measures.

    But any renewed confidence was shattered six years later in April 1986 after the Chernobyl accident – the most devastating in the history of nuclear power. ****World leaders categorically declared their continued intention to rely on the source of energy within weeks of the catastrophe, but funding for nuclear energy research dried up, the public became hostile and financiers in the US and Europe shunned the industry.****

    No new reactors were ordered in the US for 25 years while Germany, Italy and many other European countries banned the expansion of the energy source.>>

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies