Update for Apr 25 – RC has been very active today....so far has bought 134K of the 600K traded. He bought 2 blocks in the dark pools. One was 24K and the other 28K shares.
RC usually buys at 15% - 17% of the volume traded on days he is active. Today he is currently over 22%. Very bullish. Sounds like he wants to get bigger faster in front of an event??? :)
I am more then a double bagger, my average is so low that I can actually say this.
Do I post as doublebagger or BONK or ERic ????
For Ken to even suggest this is so silly and very insulting not because he connects me to those names but because me puts me down as a dishonest two timing person.
I do what I say and that has been holding on til monetization and further offtakes becoming binding
IOC now a 3 B us Co has at least two offtakes worth 25 B waiting to become binding !
Only a fool would even attempt to time this process with options, that would make investing a gamble, no way would I gamble with a million USD, IOC has yet to make good on any deadline , so I remain LONG IOC with no margins or options to force my hand, this way I have survived ALL the dips.
NOt a bad strategy so far and very comfortable to look at GREEN even on the largest dips.
I'm glad I am not a TOP financial advisor, they must be a nervous wreck with all their clients to answer to.
Think what you will, me, I'm patient and 100% sure not on timing but on the end result
Yes, so now it's been documented that Chandler has increased his ownership in IOC. And the markets said "Yawn". One shareholder a success does not make. Will shareholders celebrate as much when Chandler sells? I'm sure not. At that point it will not mean anything because we all know that when someone buys IOC shares they are the smartest people in the world. But when they sell it's really a non issue, right? Just like Soros.
You are right. All of us on the bashing side have been copying ID's and changing one or two letters of the serious investors names and saying different things just to confuse this message board. It seems not to be working because the stock price is still going up.
"Bonk - since you are a stated expert ("know it all") and clearly know more than anyone....please enlighten us with you knowledge. Please provide a breakdown of today's 790K shares traded by pipe. Further, given you must have access to all institutional flow, how many shares were traded in the dark pools today and then break the number of shares traded in the darks down by block size?
Given your access to everything trading-related, we are all interested in the level of detail YOU have access to."
Sorry to call you on your B.S. The point is not what I may or may not have access to, the point is that just becuase you can identify brokers executing trades or look at volumes in dark pools, does not allow you to see through them to see who the ultimate buyers and sellers are.
For example, dark pools by definition are anonymous (hence the term "dark"):
Bonk - since you are a stated expert ("know it all") and clearly know more than anyone....please enlighten us with you knowledge. Please provide a breakdown of today's 790K shares traded by pipe. Further, given you must have access to all institutional flow, how many shares were traded in the dark pools today and then break the number of shares traded in the darks down by block size?
Perhaps you are guessing that RC executes through one broker or trading venue, and then guess that such volume is RC. That is a far cry for the B.S. you've been spewing and stating as fact.
Ooh wait - I see someone executed a trade through Wells Fargo today - that must be Warren Buffett buying, and look ther's a Schwab trade - that must be Kenny buying LEAPs, and I see someone is executing on Knight's dark pool - that must be RC right?
In other words, you are full of it.