Here is why all the pathetic Best losers are WRONG!
Because he is too stupid or too well paid or too too stubborn- hey whatever the case I dont know, the market doesnt care- bestie doesn't understand simple concepts and he is going to lose on his short postion a LOT of money if he does not cover soon. Let me make it as simple as I can for this Gollum creaure.
Totally hypotheticaly suppose you have company called aidivN that the market currently values at say 7 Billion and anther coppany called moclauQ and the second company was vaued at 15 TIMES MORE or 110 Billion. Now lets suppose the bigger company makes 4+ times the profit and is expected to grow next year at 10%. The smaller company aidivN is expected to grow next year by 11.60% (if yahoo supplied numbers for hypothetical companies readers coud go check thats where these #s are coming from) .
If you are not sure which company is more likely to be the next two or three bagger, you can also-once again hypothetically- assume half the value of aidivN is cash so take the math above and assume N has half the sized 'mouths to feed' with its earnings.
Arguably, given the cash component of both these hyp. comapnies, Q is cash is 10% N's almost 50%. So that actualy computes to Q at about 29 TIMES valuation of N but again with ony 4+x the earnings and SAME est growth rate HUH? Watch for N to close the gap. sure maybe not all the way but approaching a three bagger sounds pretty okay ;-)
So when some creature tries to tell you that straight up comparisons of revenue and earnings dollars or absolute units sold instead of using relative percentages is how to compare massivey differnet sized companies you tell him from me to go to Hades, ya hear?
This is last warning nut shorties, the stock is under acumulation by, at a minimum, the company buy back program. It is ony a matter of time- you *will* be assimilated.