A 1 for 10 reverse split would be the kiss of death for shareholders. In my experience it's been diasterous for shareholders involved in such a split.
Case in point is Citigroup. They did a 1 for 10 reverse split at around $5/share. Analysts thought this was the cat's meow ,calling for a target price of $100/share. From the new price of $50/share the stock steadily dropped and despite a record setting stock market C has yet to reach $50.
I'd rather see a 2 or 1 split than a reverse split but would prefer no splits whatsoever. Above all I want to see some profits.
I would be very surprised to see a 1 for 10. That would be devastating , as liquidity would dry up 1 for 3 or 1 for 2 will work,
As far as name change , i think it's a done deal. GOJO is GONJO New management new board , new technology,new vision new name. C'mon guys hoPto it!