They also said that they used 18.8 months as median survival to model their control arm, and that their estimate of a Q1 32nd event was based on 9 months addition to median survival by ICT-107. This is very encouraging, considering they haven't been notified yet of a 32nd event. However, they did say there could be a lag time of multiple weeks between the event and when they are notified by the monitoring committee.
If enrollment started in January of 2011 and 'pretend' everyone is enrolled in Jan 2011...+18.8months+9 months - Jan 2011+27.8 months = March 2013...OMG...most everyone was enrolled in Jan of 2011 is what this means..wow..Strong Buy..dd, this means you can model with a 9 month OS advantage and then 10 months, 11, 12 etc...p-value of .00001
Repeat: Their estimate of a q1 32nd event was based on a 9 month addition to median survival....OMG.......
Sentiment: Strong Buy
^ Well said. I had to post before the CC because I needed to go out. Still, its nice to be guaranteed a 9 month survival advantage at minimum. It would be rediculous now to think that we would need a Phase III.