this business about seeking alpha seems to be a red herring. If seeking alpha wants to take a negative position on MJNA, why can't it? How's that defamatory? I want that kind of negativity--it's called information. Take it for what it's worth. I don't particularly like a company taking stock as payment and then calling that stock a certain dollar value. I don't care if it Apple stock, it can be $1 one day and $.50 the next. The only thing that's money is money.
Really abigchoc? So its ok for SA to publish FALSE info about the COO of this company? Its okay to publish a picture and criminal record of someone else and claim its the COO of mjna? Do you think its okay to publish tweets about how they are going to take mjna down to zero just before all these SA articles come out???
Are you that Stupid!!!
Negative is OK. Lies and insinuation are not. Some of the Seeking Alpha bloggers have made certain statements that are slanted toward their short position and the fact they say that they do not have a short position is a lie. All smoke and mirrors. I am very concerned about the MJNA share holders that lost money when they sold because of the bias, and half truths. That being said and being long on MJNA, I bought another 100000 shares yesterday at .15. Shares I would not have been willing to buy except for the bash attack. I will continue to accumulate on the dips.