You have a profound lack of knowledge about Medafor, their cash position, their cash flows, their revenue projections etc. The Medafor model, once you understand it, is just the putting together of a couple simple formulas. So simple. It would be better for SGA and GS to become functional. Then everyone would win. But understand this. Medafor already has the cash flow to both grow sales and to litigate if necessary. However, I do wish both SGA and GS would work out their differences. If the relationship were to be functional, I would have no problem with the contract continuing beyond 6 years. If is never becomes functional, we litigate for 3-4 years, and then dump CRY. One year of damages would not mean much to Medafor in terms of damages at that point. I've met GS,and he is a driven saleperson and is as honest as the day is long. I suspect that SGA and GS, in the right setting could create a win-win situation for both companies. However, if I have to fight though, it will be in defense of GS and GT. I would prefer to get along though.