that the close encounter of a rock next week is a result of GW. (I hope it's just close. But of course they won't let us know if it will hit us anyway)
That this rock is attracted to earth due to our carbon footprint is a crazy idea but accepted by some whaco's out there.
As some of you know, but most don't, global warming is a farce. It's only to make people like Gore and companies to make money.
THE REAL THREAT TO EARTH IS OVERPOPULATION.
Yes people are in danger due to the normal cycles of the sun on our earth. But Not due to our environment due to fossel fuels.
In closing there are 650,000 people in the NE who are screaming, PUT ON OUR POWER, WE"RE COLD.
Many of these people believe in global warming.
some people monitor
solar dark spots
some people monitor
there is no correlation between either
and the rise of atmospheric CO2 here
faux news viewere/dittoheads/
who cannot rise to the PNAC for the 21st century
.... That this rock is attracted to earth due to our carbon footprint is a crazy idea but accepted by some whaco's out there...
MY god - Gore is in seattle !! does that mean seattle will be hit by the rock right after he leaves in his high carbon footprint private jet and flys back to his energy in-eficent home- the whole thing to be covered by Al jazera ?
we are doomed - doomed I tell you !
Can Gore save Us ??
He invented the internet - why cant he deflect the rock to say Iran - or perhaps g bush ranch ??
There seems to be fewer large rocks which have hit the earth since time began
even though the smaller rocks which still hit the earth still come around
with regularitywhenever time began
but a foot is 12 inches
Can yu explain the correlation between the rise in greenhouse gases/atmospheric CO2
and the advent of the industrial revolution along with deforestation/desertification/overpopulation
normal cycles of the sun ?
If not, #$%$ yu fascist fool,,,
If mankind cannot influence the environment, drink the fracking water...
According to James Hansen from 2009 Obama is too late:
'President 'has four years to save Earth'
US must take the lead to avert eco-disaster
Robin McKie in New York
The Observer, Saturday 17 January 2009
Barack Obama has only four years to save the world. That is the stark assessment of Nasa scientist and leading climate expert Jim Hansen who last week warned only urgent action by the new president could halt the devastating climate change that now threatens Earth. Crucially, that action will have to be taken within Obama's first administration, he added.
Obama doesn't have a clue about climate change as his understanding of math and physics is at a 7th grade level which he announced on national TV. If Obama was intelligent enough to calculate the Earth's radiation budget and then calculate the amount of heat content reduction in the oceans that that USA CO2 cuts would make, he would know that he can do nothing that would have any significant impact on a global scale.
There are two major areas where man is increasing CO2, energy production and land use change. Land use change is contributing as much or more CO2 as is energy production but is ignored because it is the poor and developing countries that are destroying forests and altering land to produce these emissions rather than the rich developed countries like the USA. So it is too late as the contribution of global CO2 emissions for the USA is only about 7% when energy production and land use change are considered included in the calculation.
Worse yet s the fact that the 165 coal plants aleady scheduled to be shut down in the USA by 2017 will do nothing to offset the 1200 new larger coal plants that are being built by 2017 by the China and India. The measly 1 Gt per year of CO2 that the USA cuts by 2020 will be replaced and added to by Asian Pacific countries to the tune of 15Gt per year by 2020. Even a president as dumb at math as Obama is can figure out that he's deluding himself and the public in suggesting that the USA can make any meaningful reduction in CO2 in order to prevent catastrophic warming.