Michael, do some homework. Add some intelligence. Then arrive back with the basics so we can have an intelligent conversation. Your Gates defense (what is 'is'?) or Clinton defense (what is sex?) is rather tiresome, disrespectful. It also indicates you well know my point and have nothing in rebuttal. That's because I have made a proper, substantiated point that has no rebuttal. OR you lack the knowledge to continue and prefer to stick names in headlines and throw rocks. Either way, your rant below and your succeeding posts, show how shallow your position is. I am sorry to have spoken about historical context with someone who has very little. And I am sorry to have continued this discussion with someone who doesn't have the basis to define 'money', a needed grounding to the discussion in order to discuss our original points. For those reasons, you have turned this discussion into a child's. I won't go there until you do some homework. While I don't agree with all of the Duck's assertions, he sure does his homework and makes things interesting!