Thu, Apr 17, 2014, 5:55 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

The Coca-Cola Company Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • azalphainvestor azalphainvestor Apr 22, 2009 4:52 PM Flag

    Educational Gap

    It is not that we are failing across the board. There are huge numbers of exciting education innovations in America today — from new modes of teacher compensation to charter schools to school districts scattered around the country that are showing real improvements based on better methods, better principals and higher standards. The problem is that they are too scattered — leaving all kinds of achievement gaps between whites, African-Americans, Latinos and different income levels.

    Using an economic model created for this study, McKinsey showed how much those gaps are costing us. Suppose, it noted, “that in the 15 years after the 1983 report ‘A Nation at Risk’ sounded the alarm about the ‘rising tide of mediocrity’ in American education,” the U.S. had lifted lagging student achievement to higher benchmarks of performance? What would have happened?

    The answer, says McKinsey: If America had closed the international achievement gap between 1983 and 1998 and had raised its performance to the level of such nations as Finland and South Korea, United States G.D.P. in 2008 would have been between $1.3 trillion and $2.3 trillion higher. If we had closed the racial achievement gap and black and Latino student performance had caught up with that of white students by 1998, G.D.P. in 2008 would have been between $310 billion and $525 billion higher. If the gap between low-income students and the rest had been narrowed, G.D.P. in 2008 would have been $400 billion to $670 billion higher.

    There are some hopeful signs. President Obama recognizes that we urgently need to invest the money and energy to take those schools and best practices that are working from islands of excellence to a new national norm. But we need to do it with the sense of urgency and follow-through that the economic and moral stakes demand.

    With Wall Street’s decline, though, many more educated and idealistic youth want to try teaching. Wendy Kopp, the founder of Teach for America, called the other day with these statistics about college graduates signing up to join her organization to teach in some of our neediest schools next year: “Our total applications are up 40 percent. Eleven percent of all Ivy League seniors applied, 16 percent of Yale’s senior class, 15 percent of Princeton’s, 25 percent of Spellman’s and 35 percent of the African-American seniors at Harvard. In 130 colleges, between 5 and 15 percent of the senior class applied.”

    Part of it, said Kopp, is a lack of jobs elsewhere. But part of it is “students responding to the call that this is a problem our generation can solve.” May it be so, because today, educationally, we are not a nation at risk. We are a nation in decline, and our nakedness is really showing. >

    Comment.. While I dont nececessarily agree with some of Friedman's conclusions/assertions, I think it clear that additional investment in Education is in our national interest. GEt on board, Cons.

    alpha

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • regard - I think it clear that additional investment in Education is in our national interest.

      respond - As long as the existing educational system is in place giving more money to a failed socialistic educational model it will continue to fail.

      School vouchers whereby parents have a say in placing thier loved ones in a school of their choice is the only answer to our present disastorous educational policy.

      Competition will force our existing school system to improve, but throwing more money down the present system's rat hole will keep our students dumb and dumber.

      IMO Liberals have taken over our educational system and have turned it into a disaster.

      Note that almost all, if not all, of the Washington D.C. politicians send their kids to PRIVATE SCHOOLS all the while praising public education.

      Doing what they do best ..... do as I say not as I do.

      Maybe if our politicians were forced to send their kids to public schools they would vote for the school voucher program.

      Until that happens, our educational system will continue to fail.

      • 2 Replies to mrsippi05
      • "There are some hopeful signs. President Obama recognizes that we urgently need to invest the money and energy to take those schools and best practices that are working from islands of excellence to a new national norm. But we need to do it with the sense of urgency and follow-through that the economic and moral stakes demand."

        Translation: Give me more money to shovel into the NEA incinerator and help me keep my constituents bought.

        Maybe those students who are failing should convert to Islam and attend the president's school(?) Or, if being Islamic isn't politically expedient at the moment, maybe he could just personally pay to have all kids attend the $30K/year school his daughters attend(?)

        We do have one certainty: alf's seal-nostril-hair-size brain doesn't do well submerged in crap--

        DiB

      • I think we should certainly emplement several voucher districts and study whether and where vouchers improve education. Hope you are forcefully working for such a program in your local school district.

        alpha

 
KO
40.72+0.13(+0.32%)Apr 17 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.