you are viewing a single comment's thread.
May be... but enough people listen to Motley Fool. In fact, Motley Fool overall is accurate.If they are consistently wrong, Motley Fool would have been gone already.Of course, Motley Fool has its share of mistakes, who doesn't. What I am saying is what Motley Fool says DOES have an impact, whether you like it or not.
I have not followed the Fool until I started tracking Star 6 months ago. If their coverage of Star is an accurate example of their overall work, then they are not worth the time it takes to read their articles.
I agree with your assessment that "it is not worth the time it takes to read the fools articles".
What facts do you cite that "overall Motley Fool is accurate.I have no facts but I find that overall all they are wrong and idiots. I don't know that Star is a winner or loser yet.