Sat, Aug 30, 2014, 6:15 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Internap Network Services Corp. Message Board

  • kg2931 kg2931 Feb 25, 2004 1:32 PM Flag

    Caution: Beware of solara & jdnite, #2

    #2 of 2
    by: jdnite2000 02/24/04 02:14 pm ***
    Msg: 117804 of 118141

    boy do you live in a vacuum. You were on this board all day yesterday and somebody posted a message, with a link, which I believe was from Ameritrade, from all 3 underwriters in the secondary saying that the pricing would occur by Wednesday 2/25. Did you not read that message yesterday? You seem to read all the other messages. Maybe this went right over your head. Or maybe you just like to see your postings on this thread and that's why you post gibberish.


    by: kg2931 ***
    Long-Term Sentiment: Hold 02/24/04 02:29 pm
    Msg: 117807 of 118142

    I see. So you want to get in on the gang up game too. Here's the article you're referring to:

    "Internap Network Services Corp. (IIP) - 45.8 million shares pricing via CIBC and S.G. Cowen expected Wednesday."

    Tell me how this wording says "that the pricing would occur by Wednesday 2/25".


    by: solara222 02/24/04 02:40 pm ***
    Msg: 117814 of 118143

    <<"Internap Network Services Corp. (IIP) - 45.8 million shares pricing via CIBC and S.G. Cowen expected Wednesday.">>

    Let me break it down for you:

    SG and CIBC are the two major underwriters for this offering.

    It says pricing via the underwriters is expected on Wednesday. I know it is difficult to decipher that statement but I think it means tomorrow since tomorrow is Wednesday.


    by: jdnite2000 02/24/04 02:49 pm ***
    Msg: 117822 of 118143

    well ok kg I will try and explain it to you this one time only and if you persist with your attitude you will meet with my iggy(ignor) also.

    Do you think for a minute that the news release was speculation. It doesn't work that way. If they put out an announcement do you for one minute believe they are speculating or can they be trusted to put out the facts. Well since the SEC has something to say about any release that is speculation we can assume that an announcement like that is fact based. Maybe you can't but in my years in this market I have learned that it would be suicide for brokers or investment bankers to speculate on anything and then put out a release based on speculation. THUS what you read in the release is a FACT or it would not have been put out there.


    by: kg2931 ***
    Long-Term Sentiment: Hold 02/24/04 02:52 pm
    Msg: 117823 of 118145

    So now you're playing twisty fuzzy math word games with me. You are now showing your stupidity indeed. Let me break down for you what I alread did for JD but you were too stupid to get the point.

    "Internap Network Services Corp. (IIP) - 45.8 million shares pricing via CIBC and S.G. Cowen expected Wednesday."

    "Tell me how this wording says "that the pricing would occur by Wednesday 2/25"."

    In case you didn't understand my point to JDnight, the key word in the article was "by". It says "expected".

    I have no reason to bank on the offering happening TOMORROW AFOR SURE!


    by: kg2931
    Long-Term Sentiment: Hold 02/24/04 03:21 pm
    Msg: 117853 of 118149

    1) The CIBC article was not a "news release". Twas a firm's web page listing co's "expecting" POs for the week.
    2) Now you're twisting the intent of my msg. You said, "by" wednesday. The article said "expected". I merely pointed out the difference. I've since clarified to SolarASS to that I personally wouldn't bank on it happening tomorrow, wed, 2/25.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • #2 of 2
      by: jdnite2000 02/24/04 02:14 pm ***
      Msg: 117804 of 118141

      boy do you live in a vacuum. You were on this board all day yesterday and somebody posted a message, with a link, which I believe was from Ameritrade, from all 3 underwriters in the secondary saying that the pricing would occur by Wednesday 2/25. Did you not read that message yesterday? You seem to read all the other messages. Maybe this went right over your head. Or maybe you just like to see your postings on this thread and that's why you post gibberish.


      by: kg2931 ***
      Long-Term Sentiment: Hold 02/24/04 02:29 pm
      Msg: 117807 of 118142

      I see. So you want to get in on the gang up game too. Here's the article you're referring to:

      "Internap Network Services Corp. (IIP) - 45.8 million shares pricing via CIBC and S.G. Cowen expected Wednesday."

      Tell me how this wording says "that the pricing would occur by Wednesday 2/25".


      by: solara222 02/24/04 02:40 pm ***
      Msg: 117814 of 118143

      <<"Internap Network Services Corp. (IIP) - 45.8 million shares pricing via CIBC and S.G. Cowen expected Wednesday.">>

      Let me break it down for you:

      SG and CIBC are the two major underwriters for this offering.

      It says pricing via the underwriters is expected on Wednesday. I know it is difficult to decipher that statement but I think it means tomorrow since tomorrow is Wednesday.


      by: jdnite2000 02/24/04 02:49 pm ***
      Msg: 117822 of 118143

      well ok kg I will try and explain it to you this one time only and if you persist with your attitude you will meet with my iggy(ignor) also.

      Do you think for a minute that the news release was speculation. It doesn't work that way. If they put out an announcement do you for one minute believe they are speculating or can they be trusted to put out the facts. Well since the SEC has something to say about any release that is speculation we can assume that an announcement like that is fact based. Maybe you can't but in my years in this market I have learned that it would be suicide for brokers or investment bankers to speculate on anything and then put out a release based on speculation. THUS what you read in the release is a FACT or it would not have been put out there.


      by: kg2931 ***
      Long-Term Sentiment: Hold 02/24/04 02:52 pm
      Msg: 117823 of 118145

      So now you're playing twisty fuzzy math word games with me. You are now showing your stupidity indeed. Let me break down for you what I alread did for JD but you were too stupid to get the point.

      "Internap Network Services Corp. (IIP) - 45.8 million shares pricing via CIBC and S.G. Cowen expected Wednesday."

      "Tell me how this wording says "that the pricing would occur by Wednesday 2/25"."

      In case you didn't understand my point to JDnight, the key word in the article was "by". It says "expected".

      I have no reason to bank on the offering happening TOMORROW AFOR SURE!


      by: kg2931
      Long-Term Sentiment: Hold 02/24/04 03:21 pm
      Msg: 117853 of 118149

      1) The CIBC article was not a "news release". Twas a firm's web page listing co's "expecting" POs for the week.
      2) Now you're twisting the intent of my msg. You said, "by" wednesday. The article said "expected". I merely pointed out the difference. I've since clarified to SolarASS to that I personally wouldn't bank on it happening tomorrow, wed, 2/25.

    • you are truly a moron. You may take the cake as the most abnoxious poster this board has ever had. So riddle me this. If they announce the offer price at the close of todays business are you going to feel like the fool you really are. Your so numb that in order to try and get your point accross you would hang yourself out to dry and not wait for the end of the day so if they do announce you look like a fool makes it plainly clear we're dealing with a nut case.

      I have been on this board for several years and quite frankly even wasting my time responding to you is fool hardy but in the invevitable long run board members will see how trite you really are and that you just don't get it. I had you on ignore but went through the message list and saw my monniker listed and low and behold there's the infamous Kg and his crap. Now your back on the IGGY FACTOR.

      • 1 Reply to jdnite2000
      • jdnite2000,

        Attempting to divert/deny from your mistake yesterday by pointing your dirty finger at me now doesn't negate your mistake. Yesterday, you reprimanded calling me names then too saying the secondary will happen today. All this based on our interprestation of the CIBC web site "expectation". I said "I wouldn't bank on it happening today". I still have no reason to bank on it happening today. If I were to bank on anything, I'd say it won't happen today and you're going to eat your words and these hateful post of yours twice! This makes it plainly clear we're dealing with you being the "nut case".

 
INAP
6.84+0.13(+1.94%)Aug 29 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.