Would the FDA had then come out last week and said to GSK, "Sorry we're suddenly invalidating your results" as we suddenly no longer understand or believe in these measures?
Something smells VERY rotten in Denmark to me!
Sentiment: Strong Buy
The smell is coming from srpt's CEO.
He's the one that created this entire mess and caused the two year delay.
Sorry. The drug does no harm and might actually work.
So what is the harm in approving it early?
The worst thing that happens is some, or all of the boys don't get a benefit.
Whereas by not approving it early the worst thing is that some boys who might have been helped, are sentenced to hell instead, when they need not have been!
In the end will they all receive pink slips for not following the new AA policy?
Might there be a follow up investigation into any potential communications that might have originated from any large pharma that might have influenced them not following the new policy?