I actually thought the numbers were pretty good. Beat on revs $119.4M vs $101.96 from 7 analysts. EPS, adding back in the one time give $0.57 vs $0.45 from 7 analysts. The one time charge was to cover 5-10 years of estimated costs. I think on the surface, it appeared to some that this was a so so quarter or even a miss on eps but I think this was misread.
They wrote .37 cents off for the long term epa bs and made .23 cents = .60 cents.The market did misread this.I traded this 4 times yesterday.Would love for it to go back to 50.25 or lower.Nice long term hold with lots of prilosec.The analysts have a hard time with the eps range as well as the stock pickers.Just look at the range.FWIW E9