Thu, Oct 23, 2014, 4:57 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Yamana Gold, Inc. Message Board

  • hapiwondrer hapiwondrer Feb 26, 2013 5:07 PM Flag

    Open letter to Rush Limbaugh, Part I

    Dear Mr. Rush Limbaugh,

    Your discussion on “baseline budgeting” with the poor woman that was trying to understand your take on the issue was enlightening. Not on what you had to say, but what, as usual, you would NOT say.

    In particular you avoided the following statement from the US Constitution:

    Article I, Section 9, ¶ 7

    ” No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time. ...”

    Plain and simple, to avoid the previous budgetary agreement (by adopting baseline budgeting) and add to it a new agreement is a violation of the Constitution, because of said avoidance. If the Constitution was followed on this point your caller would not have been confused, which you made no effort to relieve her from by citing the correct interpretation of the US Constitution. This places you directly in the camp of the central banking elite and a big spending Federal Government.

    While you continually advertise the wonders of an education at Hillsdale College, after checking into it we found that, just like you, it is what they will not include in the curriculum that says more about their real agenda. Add to that the fact that a member of the St. Louis Federal Reserve is a visiting Professor at Hillsdale College.

    Now to get to the point: we are supposed to be a country of laws, and not of men/women, as is the case in countries ruled by royalty and tyrants. It is the US Constitution that should dictate how the Federal Government spends OUR money, so now we shall educate you, and perhaps from that you could in turn educate the educators at Hillsdale College.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Part II

      The following major budgetary items, according to the US Constitution, that is if you believe in the rule of law, are as follows:

      Article I, Section 8, ¶ 11 (Congress)

      “To declare War grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; ...”

      Further:

      Article I, Secton 8, ¶ 12

      “To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than TWO YEARS; ...” (emphasis added)

      Article II, Section 1, ¶ 7

      “The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them. ...”

      If this was interpreted correctly, it would be according to what passes as the US Constitution’s definition of money, and not some fraudulent fiat dollar amount.

      Article 1, Section 10, ¶ 1

      “No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; ...”

      It is obvious, Mr. Limbaugh, since you chuse to avoid what “money” is defined as in the US Constitution, that you have aligned yourself with the banking cabal, meaning a central bank founded by predominantly foreign European banking elitists dating back to 1910, and before, whose objective has always been total control of all of humanity. As an “educator” this fact never issues from your pie hole.

      • 1 Reply to hapiwondrer
      • Part III

        WE DON’T CARE, what “professors” at Hillsdale College seek to be dismissive of when it comes to what “money” should consist of. The US Constitution was written for all of us, and not a bunch of elitist Supremes in black robes who want to stretch the language out of all proportion from what its original meaning was to the satisfaction of a fraudulent central bank, the Federal Reserve, and all their foreign allies.

        Those who chuse to make a big issue out of Iran’s threat of nuclear weapon development seem to have totally blacked out a recent development there. Iran is going to actually carry out the punishment prescribed by their version of the Coinage Act of 1792.

        Further: Article 1, Section 8, ¶ 6

        “To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States; ...”

        This was further defined by the Coinage Act of 1792, which states within:

        Penalty on de- Section 19. And be it further enacted, That

        basing the coins. if any of the gold or silver coins which

        shall be struck or coined at the said mint

        shall be debased or made worse as to the

        proportion of the fine gold or fine silver

        therein contained, or shall be of less weight

        or value than the same out to be pursuant to

        the directions of this act, through the

        default or with the connivance of any of the

        officers or persons who shall be employed at

        the said mint, for the purpose of profit or

        gain, or otherwise with a fraudulent intent,

        and if any of the said officers or persons

        shall embezzle any of the metals which shall

        at any time be committed to their charge for

        the purpose of being coined, or any of the

        coins which shall be struck or coined at the

        said mint, every such officer or person who

        shall commit any or either of the said

        offenses, shall be deemed guilty of felony,

        and shall suffer DEATH (emphasis added).

        Further all subsequent versions of the original Coinage Act were conspiratorial events that take us to where we are today.

        FDR’s confiscation of the citizens’ money was an act of treason through his Executive Order.

 
AUY
5.58+0.05(+0.90%)4:03 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.