<You make money in your dreams so that is why you come here to get that chip off your shoulder and save few bucks you'd pay your shrink to help you maintain sanity.>
These are very insightful comments that clearly reflect a deep understanding of the issues at hand. I am suitably impressed and would like to recant everything I said earlier to disturb your outlook of this fine company.
<Are you looking at the same trial results as I am? Or listening to the same conference calls as I am?>
Yes and Yes (although I get quite board with the latter)
<You have no clue what you are talking about!>
Quite presumptuous really, given that you nothing about me or what I know of VLTS.
<Low float + good news= major blow to your wallet.>
There is enough float and good news is something I am willing to bet against when it comes to VLTS and this product. There is nothing behind the "science" of the current PIIb, but you go ahead and believe what you want; its a free world.
FYI, when it is all said and done and you are looking back for answers, remember this: (a) To keep the gravy train running, VLTS management had to start the PIIb trial and (b) The PIIa primary endpoint for both "active" arms (one was supposed to be placebo, but I digress) were within historical baselines (ie had no effect).
Do you really think you are backing a winner? I know you do! That's why I am able to make money.