Sorry, I figured a 5 minute research session would satisfy you like Harvey's off the cuff analysis.
Try silverbars' post
" Low trading volume maybe? Less price volatility making arbitrage less profitable?"
This is your argument for the shares remaining exactly the same for over a month? Are you dumb, or just playing dumb?
You mean like the similar circumstances in 09 and 07? Low trading volume maybe? Less price volatility making arbitrage less profitable?
Do you still trust Harvey even with all the things about SLV he's clueless about.
Of course it is manipulated. And it is ridiculous to suggest it can't be just because the price has been allowed to appreciate to some degree. No inventory could possibly be held to such exacting amounts, continuously, for so long. Does the term supply and demand mean anything to the manipulation deniers?