Tue, Sep 16, 2014, 8:03 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Sony Corporation Message Board

  • aiwal1 aiwal1 Apr 24, 2012 5:41 AM Flag

    WHY SONY CAN'T COMPETE IN COMPUTERS

    Alot has been written past year about how and why SONY can't compete with the Korean TV Box makers. Sony with its excessive army of 'salaryman retirees' and higher Japanese wages, can't make TVs as cheaply as the newer Korean and Chinese cos. can.

    But in Computers its not just 'legacy costs' of SONY's big former workforce. Its not just higher costs of Japanese labor and managers. Its the MICROSOFT SOFTWARE SONY PCs run on.

    Long ago, Apple was small in size vs. all the IBM PC Clone Computer Cos., which MICROSOFT SOLD / SUPPLIED THE SOFTWARE FOR. Apple Computers much smaller production runs and smaller quantity of parts purchases back in the 1990s and 1980s, meant Apple computers cost alot more than IBM PC Clones, such as SONY and Toshiba and NEC, and Leading Edge and Packard Bell and Compaq and Dell and others made.

    But APPLE kept going, and over a long time, became big enough its production runs got bigger and its costs down, so it could make a computer of any given quality for only a bit more cost than the IBM/Microsoft Clone Computer Cos. Further, Apple moved all its PRODUCTION TO near-slave wages CHINA (so cheaper production than many other computer cos.).

    Now with Economies of Scale, and Large Financial Warchest, and no army of "salarymen retirees" to eat up its future profits (since Apple's workers in China are all subcontracted out to Foxconn),... Apple has much higher profit margins on its computers sold than any of the Clone Computer Cos.

    PLUS UNLIKE SONY and TOSHIBA and HP...etc, APPLE NEED NOT PAY BULK OF THE PROFIT FROM EACH COMPUTER SALE TO MICROSOFT. SONY HAS A MICROSOFT PARASITE EXTRACTING PART OF EACH SALE, THE PROFIT FROM EACH SALE, is main problem now.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • >Long ago, Apple was small in size <

      In the beginning Apple had 100% PC market share and pooped it off by making wrong decisions and still would'nt be nothing today if not for the gadgets they dream up.

      • 1 Reply to pigeon_undertaker
      • Wrong, Apple never had anywhere near 100% of the market. In the beginning there was Altair Kit Computers that gave Apple the idea. There was also Commodore Computers and Radio Shack Trs-80 personal computers, both had more market share than Apple. There was also Epson portable computers in 1983. None of these ran on Apple or Microsoft software. There were numerous other brands before Microsoft and IBM Compatible PCs. APPLE never had even a majority of the market in PCs, let alone 100%. Apple always made a better computer, it cost more. Now it doesn't cost much more.

    • Simple. Over Priced & Poor Customer Support.

      I can buy an i7 Dell (same specs) for about $300 less than a Sony.

 
SNE
20.25+0.38(+1.91%)Sep 16 4:01 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
Adobe Systems Inc.
NasdaqGSTue, Sep 16, 2014 4:00 PM EDT
VirnetX Holding Corp
NYSE MKTTue, Sep 16, 2014 4:00 PM EDT
Rackspace Hosting, Inc.
NYSETue, Sep 16, 2014 4:00 PM EDT