It seems you had problems reading just the very basic statements contained within this two page filing.. here is the entire section (3).. the part you missed is at the bottom..
"(3) Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations from the corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the earnings statements to be included in the subject report or portion thereof?
[X] Yes [_] No
The company’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 operating results are not comparable to the prior year as the company effected a reverse merger that resulted in significantly different operations and financial condition."
So when you say the company's filing is going to be "horrid".. I'd have to ask you to qualify that statement. Based on what business knowledge or experience do you base this already pre-conceived judgment?
It's going to be fun watching you perform analysis on just the basics.. i.e. revenue, gross margin.. let alone anything else.. I always get a belly laugh out of your posts.
Keep in mind LS.. better to remain silent and be thought of as a fool.. than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. LOLOLOLOLOL.
and why would we expect anything different? .. they spew bs 24/7 and mangle and twist each piece of info .. be it dealers or filings
again ... there is a sequence that is followed .. and in this world of sarbox .. the auditors <gruber> control all ...so when they are ready .. they will sign off .. then bh can sign off then they get filed ... here's to being filed by 2:30 est .. tomorrow .. it may happen wednesday .. regardless it will happen
i'm looking for 3 bits of info .. in the filing .. then i'm more interested in what should be pr'd afterwards .. and i hope like hell we are looking at a new ir firm on the bottom of those coming pr's