You seem to be in desperate need of facts to refute your blatant lies so here goes:
"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US House of Representatives
October 10, 2002
Congressional Record, p. H7777
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members...
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well, effects American security.
This is a very difficult vote, this is probably the hardest decision I've ever had to make. Any vote that might lead to war should be hard, but I cast it with conviction."
Hillary Clinton, US Senator from NY
October 10, 2002
"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
Former President Clinton
During an interview on CNN's "Larry King Live"
July 22, 2003
impossible2no got it right. He posted this: "Yet we do know that during the George Bush administration that 11 US Embassies were attacked and caused 53 deaths and 90 injuries. Why do you believe that there is never any mention the far greater problem with embassies in Bush's administration? Could there be a lack of being "fair and balanced"?"
IRS Began Targeting Conservatives in March 2010...
Probe Expands To Groups Opposed To Gov't, Teaching Constitution...
Scrutiny Deeper Than Thought...
'Kept shifting targets in tax-exempt groups'...
Agency accused of leaking confidential tax documents during election...
FLASHBACK: Romney donor vilified by Obama campaign, then subjected to 2 audits...
Did Plouffe Justify IRS Targeting Conservative Groups?
What is so important about Benghazi except Republicans lost the election. We are in war with terrorists. You expect to lose no one even in country as dangerous as Libya., How many special Ops guys lost their lives getting Osama. Zero Dark Thirty. OB hunted down Osama better than dumb Bush and nailed him along with scores of other Al Qaeda honchos. They are no longer the big giant threat they were. They have been decimated thanks to OB. That's the bottom line. You are sore loser #$%$ Republicans. Its war but one US ambassador gets killed and you are making a big deal in an anti- American country such as Libya. If you go to Libya you know you are putting yourself in a dangerous place, just like a soldier volunteers for duty in Afghanistan. He was no more important than one of thousands of US soldiers who died. It's called war. Meanwhile we got rid of Qaddafi. So you make a big deal about every dead soldier and blame OB. Of course not. You are total idiots and that's why your Tea party is a total loser as well. You're all on the way out. You also lost. You'll realize that if you ever wake up.