Sir,you are a flimflam man from a rimram room. Its plain to me that you think that anyone who has acquired wealth should be unfairly taxed.So why should I knock myself out going to school,working hard,sacrificing all manner of good fun,just to end up giving more than my fair share.No if 1% of the people are holdin up more than there share,they should be the first to eat.Sorry but thats the fact!!
Well, if deficits are so bad, how come an overlay of any metric you can name (stock market performance, economic growth, etc.) on top of Reagan's "record" deficits shows everything taking off like a rocket soon AFTER the tax cuts of the early 80's?
And to refresh your memory, the "Clinton" economic expansion didn't really kick in until the Republicans took over Congress in '94.
Clinton was nothing more than a lucky beneficiary of the incredible growth of IT spending in the 90's to replace old legacy computer systems and comply with Y2K standards coupled with the growth of globalization. At least he had the good sense to get out of the way.
Now John F'ing Kerry wants to pander to the union vote by denouncing outsourcing. One thing's for sure: Companies that go bankrupt because of the democrats "protectionist" posture won't be hiring anyone, onshore or offshore.