ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc. Message Board

  • keimosaabe keimosaabe Dec 4, 2006 5:54 PM Flag

    Very Few Firms allow shorting a $1 Stock

    Come on already, alot of crap being flung here!

    No Major brokerage firm allows shorting a stock under $5.00.

    the small firms that do, I'm sure, have a 100%+ margin requirement and have the stock in house.

    I honestly believe all the claims off shorting is just
    plain crap.

    Lucky it is crap, you buy the future, and the future of
    CMGI looks alot brighter.

    Wait until the Annual Stockholders meeting this Wednesday.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • You are right on the money with your comments about market makers, bashers, pumpers, etc. However, there is one small point I would like to expand on. It is possible to short Bulletin Board, Pink Sheet, or NASDAQ stocks under $1. It is not easy as the stock has to have been hypothecated somewhere. This means that in the case of these stocks there is little short-selling, and there is frequently considerable competition for available shares--resulting in the appearance of many of these stocks on the Reg SHO list. The decision to let a client short these stocks is always a brokerage house decision (there are no SEC or NASD rules prohibiting it), and brokerage houses are very wary about letting clients engage in an activity with a potentially infiinite loss, which the brokerage house itself might have to make up. Thus, such shorting typically takes place with full-service, not discount, brokerage firms, and the margin requirements are brutal. Thus, such Bulletin Board, Pink Sheet and low-priced NAZ stocks never have a large percentage of their float shorted--despite the constant whinings on message boards. In fact, these stocks will frequently start failing with less than 10% of their float shorted, whereas a regular NAZ stock would typically require much, much more.

      So, you were fundamentally correct--such short-selling is not a particularly important market factor, but it does exist.

    • You are right on the money with your comments about market makers, bashers, pumpers, etc. However, there is one small point I would like to expand on. It is possible to short Bulletin Board, Pink Sheet, or NASDAQ stocks under $3. It is not easy as the stock has to have been hypothecated somewhere. This means that in the case of these stocks there is little short-selling, and there is frequently considerable competition for available shares--resulting in the appearance of many of these stocks on the Reg SHO list. The decision to let a client short these stocks is always a brokerage house decision (there are no SEC or NASD rules prohibiting it), and brokerage houses are very wary about letting clients engage in an activity with a potentially infiinite loss, which the brokerage house itself might have to make up. Thus, such shorting typically takes place with full-service, not discount, brokerage firms, and the margin requirements are brutal. Thus, such Bulletin Board, Pink Sheet and low-priced NAZ stocks never have a large percentage of their float shorted--despite the constant whinings on message boards. In fact, these stocks will frequently start failing with less than 10% of their float shorted, whereas a regular NAZ stock would typically require much, much more.

      So, you were fundamentally correct--such short-selling is not a particularly important market factor, but it does exist.

 
MLNK
2.76-0.06(-2.13%)May 24 4:00 PMEDT