"network processors such as those from EZChip and Xelerated lack required performance when OEMs program them with many of the emerging services in which carriers are interested."
these kinds of statements, from those within the industry, concern me when i see what is happening with the action beneath the surface of our stock.
i'll be watching how many employees cash out their stock options at these recent runup prices, very very carefully. they would know better than anyone imho. actions vs words.
does anyone with industry technical knowledge have any specifics to refute the perfomance loss claims raised in the article that started this thread???
if not, i'd say they must be true and we should work together as longs to understand exactly what these features are that seem to degrade our npu performance.
at least that way we won't get blindsided if we do the homework up front and know what true performance risks we have as long holders of this fabless chip stock.
anyone have a clue about npu features and performance measurements and benchmarks???
or maybe it was the insider sales mention that got them all worried.
longs, watch the insider sales and employee stock options exercised at the next report as of 9/30.
alias boy sure is busy on this board ever since the secondary approached a few weeks out.
coincidence? honest readers can be their own judge.
since you and you alone has determined the idenity of this alias boy, would please ID him or her.
If you cannot, you are relying on your dispicable McCarthy style witch hunts.
Your witch hunts need to stop. YOU HAVE ruined this board with your witch hunts, can't you comprehend that?
none of the pumpers could ever come up with anything to refute these technical performance concerns raised in this article.
but they sure tried hard to bury the issue.
they sure seem intent on controlling the negative factual risks associated with this stock.
it makes honest readers and investors have to ask themselves "why?".....
lol@u alias boy.
would you please address these technical concerns, rather than just crying out wolf.
Or you could rationalize these concerns by acknowledging that "we" will not be able to do so, and assume the Juniper Networks Inc. has thoroughly investigated the majority of these issues.
uh oh, Lightstorm may have a chip available at the end of 2008
uh oh, I better warn everyone
SAN JOSE, Calif. � Startup Lightstorm Networks has come out of stealth mode with its plans and its first chip tailoring Ethernet switching to the needs of carriers. The Brooklyn-10 is a 10 Gbit/second Ethernet switch supporting in an off-the shelf device the kind of scaling, statistics and services the company says carriers require.
last paragraph...The company has snagged $21 in an A series of venture capital to date, enough to take it through delivering the chips on its road map by the end of 2008. It expects to raise another round of funding sometime in 2008.
uh oh, be careful newbies, I am here to protect you.
lightstorm chip is sampling now, 6-12 or 18 months for design win, re-spins, etc. final product, availability, products testings, etc. product viability in the market place add another 6, 12 months...looks like too little to late to me. respond if you have better facts, as this is my viewpoint.
uh oh, I wrote something foolish
uh oh, I hope someone responds, then I can challenge them to explain why they are not worried like I am
uh oh, uh oh, oh good someone reponded
now I can challenge/attack under the guise of being on topic, then I hope they call me a name and then I can expose and accuse them of being a paid poster or something.
uh oh I must monitor this board
uh oh, must be over 30 million share by now, I must worry
uh oh, I need to count how many employees exercise their stock options?
uh oh, they must know was AT&T, Verizon, et all, capital spending plans are?
Uh oh, maybe I need to contact each employee and find out their personal financial situation and determine whether or not they might need or want their money for personal reasons
uh oh, I must warn people, I must warn people
uh oh, save the world, I must, I must uh oh!
there you go talking to yourself again.
why are you running away instead of providing support for your silly claims?
it must suck having your lack of knowledge exposed and there is nothing you can do to fake it.
keep running..... (your mouth mostly)
leaving so soon? without offering any support for your claims that the article is irrelevant?
need more time to call some friends and come up with some details to post that make you seem partially smart?
lol@ our resident poser and coward imho.
to quote someone i've heard in the news fairly recently:
"you know nothing!"