b/c the share price was stable.
That's the problem.
also Rhonda's selling and the Board is buying. Hope they are not paying a middleman to handle this exchange of funds.
so what is the expectation, in the short term here? msg board is devoid of any hypsters to either side, so perhaps some intelligent opinions possible. I actually took a small put position pre-earnings, based on the charts only... seems to be working so far... but if it goes against me, oh well.. but short term chart does signal sub-50.. perhaps all the way to 45.
Looking for the link at the moment, but a few months ago, when they fired the ceo for an affair with an ex-employee, while his divorce is still pending (dumbest thing I ever heard of)... did the board not state a ouble digit growth was in order? or perhaps I had one too many beers in me when I think I thaw that...
price action today tells me more downward pressure is coming
Im fairly certain you are correct.
How the heck long does it take to find a ceo here? Is the stink that bad. Yahoo and HPQ have gone through about 3 each already...
Maybe they can hire Obama when he is kicked out of office. He seems to know all about healthcare....maybe Kathleen Sebelius another sharpie.
They need to sell. JNJ right now has their hands full with their latest acquisition to buy SYK. SYK missed the boat...
Hah! Most people consider Romneycare a success, probably including Romney. It is just that the money boys wouldn't fund his campaign if he said that. And if there is anything Rmoney wants more of it is money. This week he is even going to attend overseas fundraisers (something only Republican candidates have ever done).
That way he can be beholden to not just domestic but foreign contributors.
Haha, that's funny. Not your assertion that the Democrats are doing it too, which is contradicted by the article, but the corollary that you think Romney and his handlers simply aren't 'clever' enough to follow the Democrats' example and simply not get caught.
What's next, will you propose the campaign slogan "Vote Republican Because They're Dumb"?
Oh my, you have to go back 150 years to find an honest Republican? And one that today's Republicans would consider not just a RINO, but a socialist? Attacking proponents of States' Rights? Taking property from hardworking small business owners without even paying them a thin dime in compensation? Raising taxes just to fight a war? I can hear Hannity's now - "no, no, a thousand times no to Lincoln"!
No more LOLs, I'm choking already
hey..I think you are Harry Reid using an alias.
Onoy he and apparently you can distort facts like that. Some reliable source phone you with that 150 year line?
Clinton/Ggore was about as dishonest as they come..ask Monica.
States Rights (which I do support) is one issue but separated States (as in a CSA) is a totally specious argument you spew.
Democraps what al the control in D.C. this way the ABA, unions etc just have one city to travel to for financial contributions.