Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Amarin Corporation plc Message Board

  • vampirehunter50 vampirehunter50 Jul 20, 2013 1:19 PM Flag

    Omega-3 Fatty Acids Linked to Higher Risk of Cancer: Time

    not good for Adcom review

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • todhale@rocketmail.com todhale Jul 21, 2013 11:20 AM Flag

      LMAO! What ID did you use before, a**hole? Shouldn't you be at comic-con, pathetic POS.

      Sentiment: Strong Buy

    • They help with brain function. If you start taking megadoses, your IQ might increase to equal a turnip with: Time.

    • Only DHA, Vascepa will soar!

    • It's jag offs like this that make me stay over on Stock Twits. This don't fly over there.

    • Ask your mother, she takes fat ones up the rear end, by now she should be dead.

    • man, old news and useless info.
      And you already that.

      WASHINGTON, D.C., July 11, 2013-In response to a new study, "Plasma Phospholipid Fatty Acids and Prostate Cancer Risk in the SELECT Trial," published yesterday online in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), the leading trade association representing the dietary supplement industry, today issued the following statement:
      Statement by Duffy MacKay, N.D., vice president, scientific and regulatory affairs, CRN:

      "The numerous benefits of omega-3 fatty acids from foods (like salmon and sardines) and dietary supplements are well-established for men and women in all stages of life-and this new study does not change those recommendations about the importance of this nutrient. Hundreds of studies over the past two decades have shown omega-3 fatty acids to have positive effects associated with cardiovascular health, perinatal health, inflammation, cognitive function, or cancer. Collectively, this body of research serves as the basis for numerous recommendations from respected organizations, scientific boards and healthcare practitioners that Americans get omega-3 fatty acids in their diets.

      While we encourage researchers to continue to study omega-3 fatty acids with an open mind, it is counterproductive when studying nutrition for researchers to promote their study as if it were the only piece of research that counts. In this case in particular, it is especially disingenuous for the researchers to make the kinds of assertions we've seen in the press, given their results are in stark contrast to previous epidemiologic studies1 that not only demonstrate no correlation between omega-3 consumption through fish and/or supplementation and the risk of prostate cancer, but in many cases also showed a protective effect against prostate cancer.

      Further, the researchers were quick to blame dietary supplements even though there is no evidence that anybody in this study took fish oil dietary supplements. In fact, the study demonstrates no cause and effect; it can only purport to show an association between higher plasma levels of omega-3 fatty acids and those whom the researchers advise had an increased rate of prostate cancer.

      One should also consider whether this study could have simply been measuring a biomarker reflecting recent intake of fish or fish oil supplements in a group of high risk cancer patients that had been told to increase their EPA and DHA levels, as compared to a group of non-cancer patients that had not been told to consume more EPA and DHA. Plasma levels of EPA and DHA reflect very recent intake and are considered a poor biomarker of long term omega-3 intake especially when compared to red blood cell levels, which reflect medium term intake. A single fish oil dose (or hearty serving of fish at lunch) results in 100 percent increase in plasma omega-3 levels. So looking at plasma levels in healthy and sick people may only provide insight into the recent habits of these individuals.

      Additionally, the study's conclusions are also limited by the fact that the study was not designed to evaluate the question the researchers sought to confirm.

      The American Heart Association, the World Health Organization (WHO), the U.S. Institute of Medicine's Food Nutrition Board (IOM FNB) and the 2010 Dietary Guidelines all have current policies advising Americans to eat more fatty fish to get the benefits of omega-3 fish oils. It is highly unlikely this one study will change that advice. Omega-3s can also be obtained by taking one of the many supplement products on the market. For those consumers who have concerns about prostate cancer or other questions about omega-3 fatty acids, we recommend speaking with your doctor or other healthcare practitioner."

 
AMRN
2.23+0.14(+6.70%)Aug 28 4:00 PMEDT