% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

LTC Properties Inc. Message Board

  • horneyranch horneyranch Apr 5, 2001 10:49 AM Flag

    andre, ferdiefor, our resident ltc

    reit expert who does seem to have a great deal of knowledge, says your finished, caput, all done, crapped out:what do you think? I guess the next earnings report should tell the tale; if you are still pissing money away into lti because you refuse to sell losing properties, even at a loss to prevent more losses in the future, then i would agree with ferdie and think you should resign since you just dont have very good judgment imo

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • horney, this reit could go on for as long as the lenders are willing to let it or is able to generate enough cash flow to keep debt payments up. PRT is an example of a reit with such complicated financing that the lenders are in a box.

      I should have clarified that this reit is "done" as it relates to its investment potential. I cannot judge its operating abilities because it can or will continue to operate for the benefit of mgmt for as long as possible. PRT is a testament to the fact that a "done" reit can keep operating, find money to borrow at prime +7-9%; sell off assets to paydown debt a little here and there.

      I never said this Andre character should resign.

      I cannot find big fault with the OHI, NHI, or LTC model. When I did my analysis of all these reits back in 1998 it was easily understood that the top tier reits paid less in dividends and were safer investments because they had greater operator diversity and they had for the most part top tier operators. LTC, OHI, and NHI operator mix was more concentrated and their operators were not as strong financially.

      You, the investors in these weaker healthcare reits chose to earn the 200-300 basis point dividend difference that was a clear signal that these reits had greater risk. For a long time it could be said that OHI and LTC were outperforming HCP, HCN, NHP, and HR and were in fact getting better analyst writeups because of the appearance that these reits had turned out to have a good operator mix AND were offering higher dividend yields and growth than the old guard healthcare reits.

      The most important lesson for all in healthcare reits is to stand with the old guard, take the lower dividends in return for a much greater measure of safety. That has been my motto all the way and the rewards are being given to those investors as I write this to you. BUT, always must be vigilent to make sure that even the best reits do not get cocky by their past success and start to overreach beyond their internal capabilities.

      • 2 Replies to ferdiefor
      • for your, as always informative posts. Given my return since buying LTC, I can say your posts are almost worth the pain. (Please keep posting AND often!)

        Are there any macro factors that could change your opinion concerning the potential growth/valuation rates of LTC business, properties, etc.? It seems (like a mirage) that Medicare reimbursements are always on the cusp of being increased. The logjam in the credit markets we saw pressuring leveraged borrowers at the end of '00 seems to be ever-so-slowly giving way. Obviously as the wider market melts down the corresponding need for cash continues to hurt the more leveraged, operationally challenged. But are these, and any other factors reason to be optimistic in the LONGER TERM?

        Regards and thanks again.

        (Thanks too high yield and doggydog.)

      • i never said you claimed andre should resign; thats my notion; but thanks for your input; i will just keep my fingers crossed

46.34+0.14(+0.30%)May 26 4:02 PMEDT