Do you really think that by cluttering up this discussion board with nonsense and scorn that you will in any way affect a) the outcome of the scientific process or b) the confidence of investors who clearly know a lot more about the history and principles behind this therapy?
Those of us who been evaluating the strength of this investment for a number of years now have endured a lot more pain and uncertainty than your witticisms are going to lay on us. All you are doing at this point is demonstrating that you don't have anything meaningful to offer to the conversation. What is annoying is not the strength of your arguments (there isn't any) but the fact that you are working to drown out reasonable conversation. It's not something any real investor would take pride in.