Wed, Oct 22, 2014, 12:20 PM EDT - U.S. Markets close in 3 hrs 40 mins

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

The GEO Group, Inc. Message Board

  • mcprison mcprison Apr 1, 2002 1:04 PM Flag

    Another lawsuit against Wackenhut

    http://www.bakersfield.com/local/story/865154p-950724c.html

    Lawyers seek to expand Wackenhut suit

    By FRED LUDWIG, Californian staff writer
    e-mail: fludwig@bakersfield.com

    Sunday March 31, 2002, 10:30:01 PM

    Attorneys for a group of current and former Wackenhut Corporation workers want to expand
    an overtime-pay lawsuit against the private prison company to hundreds of workers.

    The company, which runs several Kern County prisons, has made employees work overtime
    without paying them for it, a lawsuit alleges.

    Ten people filed the suit in December in Kern Superior Court. But attorneys are seeking to
    certify the suit as a class-action complaint on behalf of large numbers of current and former
    company workers in California.

    Attorneys estimate that group could number between 800 and 2,400 people, said plaintiff's
    attorney Philip Ganong.

    However, such a move requires judge approval, and Kern judges allow few, if any, such
    class-action lawsuits, Ganong said. Ganong said he is not aware of any class-action suits ever
    being litigated here.

    The decision is based on a series of factors, such as whether there is a readily definable group
    and whether the members of that group have circumstances in common, Ganong said.

    Ganong said the current group of plaintiffs includes workers from all of Wackenhut's six
    California prisons -- in Taft, Adelanto, San Diego and three in McFarland.

    Practices vary from one prison to another, Ganong said.

    Wackenhut misclassified some of its workers, telling them they didn't qualify for overtime
    because they are paid on a salary basis, rather than hourly, Ganong said. But he said
    companies cannot just call someone a manager and then deny overtime pay. The law allows
    such a designation only for workers who perform supervisory duties more than half the time,
    Ganong said.

    Other hourly employees were classified properly but at times were not paid for overtime they
    had worked, Ganong said.

    For example, the routine for correctional officers checking out at the end of a shift -- such as
    turning in keys -- at times lasts beyond the end of the eight-hour period, Ganong said. But, in
    at least some such cases, no overtime was allowed, Ganong said.

    In other violations, employees at times were not given proper rest and meal breaks, the suit
    alleges.

    In many cases, the unpaid overtime was only for a half-hour a day, Ganong said. But he said it
    amounts to substantial time, given the number of workers affected over long time periods.

    "They need to follow the law," Ganong said.

    The company could try to structure shifts differently to avoid overtime if possible, Ganong said.
    If not, he said it should pay the overtime.

    The suit seeks unspecified back wages and a judge's order barring improper practices.

    Margaret Pearson, Wackenhut corporate communications vice president, declined to
    comment.

 
GEO
37.91+0.05(+0.13%)12:20 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.