Jason Jiang's capped call inserted in new 2010 20-f/a
In addition, Mr. Jiang has historically entered into agreements involving shares in Focus Media. For instance, on September 10, 2010, Mr. Jiang (through his wholly-owned subsidiary JJ Media Investment Holding Limited, or JJ Media) entered into three Capped Call Transactions, which transactions were subsequently amended on June 22, 2011, September 22, 2011 and November 25, 2011. Mr. Jiang (through JJ Media) entered into the Capped Call Transactions in order to gain synthetic economic exposure to Focus Media shares over time. Such Capped Call Transactions are cash-settled and settlement will not affect Mr. Jiang or JJ Media’s ownership of shares. Concurrently with entering into such Capped Call Transactions, JJ Media received aggregate proceeds of approximately $153.1 million as the selling shareholder in an underwritten public offering of 8.1 million ADSs, representing approximately 5.7% of our total outstanding share capital at the time. Mr. Jiang also made an US$11.0 million block trade purchase of our ADSs on November 22, 2011, representing approximately 0.5% of our total outstanding share capital at the time. Accordingly, Mr. Jiang has historically entered, and may continue to enter, into transactions relating to his holdings in Focus Media in connection with his personal investments and financing activities. Mr. Jiang has repeatedly affirmed his commitment to Focus Media and we expect that he will remain a major shareholder in Focus Media. All transactions he enters into are made pursuant to our securities trading policy and relevant U.S. securities laws and are disclosed in Mr. Jiang’s filings under Form 13D to provide relevant disclosure to investors.
“As Mr. Jiang and Mr. Yu were both heavily involved in our daily operations in our early stages of growth, we chose to designate them as the nominee shareholders of certain PRC operating affiliates, including Focus Media Advertisement and Focus Media Advertising.”
“We have not transferred the equity interests from Mr. Jiang and Mr. Yu to our PRC operating subsidiaries, as we have been migrating and will continue to migrate the businesses operated by our PRC operating affiliates to our PRC operating subsidiaries.”
[if I’m not mistaken “we” includes Jiang and Yu. ]
We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to U.S. domestic public companies, including reporting requirements under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including:
• the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K;
• the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents, or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act;
• the sections of the Exchange Act, including Section 16, requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time; and
39 ________________________________________ Table of Contents • the selective disclosure rules by issuers of material non-public information under Regulation FD. We will be required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to publish our results on a quarterly basis as press releases, distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of Nasdaq. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will be less extensive and less timely compared to that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, you may not be afforded the same protections or information that would be made available to you were you investing in a U.S. domestic issuer.