It took 70 people to post 1/2 of March's messages.
How many people did it take to post the other half?
One thousand four hundred and thirty eight (1438) people.
Total Posts: 26868
so, the quick extrapolation says we should see post #1,000,000 on or about June 9:
total posts to date 940169
add'l posts needed 59831
months to achieve 59831/26868 = 2.227
2 months = June 2
.227 *30 = 6.8
June 2 + 6.8 = June 9
Assumes, of course, that March was a "normal" posting volume.
I can only say again, I was not referring to you or your posts. I only chose to reply to your post to state my own thoughts...because that is where the subj was raised.
I hope you Pipe Up when you have something to say...Keep us posted on Number 2 and Climbing.
I do not find it unethical to present one's thoughts, beliefs, opinions, and thesis based on factual information. I find talking out of one side of one's mouth while positioning the other side incredibly unethical. Not an accusation, just a position statement.
If true, I respect a man that holds to what he considers ethical. I can not see, nonetheless, why exchanging views about a stock you are long or short is unethical -- so long as you do not lie, which is a crime.
How about your mathematical fantasy?
I provided data, not analysis. You were the one
who said that the data proved something.
So why don't you use some of your "advanced calculus"
to prove your analysis?
Show your work!
Mr.Taxi claims I was stopped out.
He is wrong. I said I would sell on the "Dead cat
That bounce has never stopped.
You say I don't post much unless RMBS is going down.
The truth is, I don't post much when I am long
on a stock.
I find it unethical.