% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Rambus Inc. Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • xquestor xquestor Aug 22, 2011 10:08 AM Flag

    They don't own edge-lit panels either.

    Section 1.4 is very interesting! Rambus wants to start a consortium (cartel) and charge an entrance fee to a limited number of memory producers.


    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies

      In 1996 Billy Garrett, Ramscam's first JEDEC representative and one of their attendees involved in gleaning information from the SDRAM and DDR standardization process to aid in construction of their "patent minefield", went into great detail as to what was envisioned in a bogus "Rambus standards committee"

      They would falsely pretend "openness" while ignoring input from anyone, even the abundance of engineers with both better skills and better ideas. They would demand "patent pooling" of any and all improvements on their Rambus, using the 1990 scrapheap as a "blocking patent" to prevent anyone trapped in the pool from escaping without a lawsuit. All would be centered around the Rambus of the moment (it was ever-changing in order to escape the myriad deficiencies Ramscam originally designed in and elaborated on in order to "fix" their "invention) and incentives to be independently innovative would be discouraged by Ramscam's ability to ignore input, use its "patent" as a bludgeon and force "sharing" of IP among their "partners".

      A real cockamamie mess.


      The transcript of the FTC investigation of Ramscam's monopolization scheme delves into his psychopathic view of the benefit of standards as well:

      "Q. If I could direct your attention to the second
      page, the third paragraph from the bottom.
      The first
      sentence there, you write, "The most valuable patents
      are ones that must be used in order to be in compliance
      with the standard."
      Do you see that?
      A. Yes, sir, I do.
      Q. And the reason they're valuable is that such
      patents cannot be avoided. Is that right?
      A. Well, in the situation to where you want to
      build a device that's compliant with the standard,
      whatever the standard is.
      Q.Okay, well, that's what you wrote in the very
      next sentence, isn't it?
      Let me read that sentence for you.
      "Unlike implementation patents which may or may
      not be required for the job
      -- to get the job done,
      ones that must be used cannot be avoided.""

      This is the essence of Ramscam's patent philosophy. They don't care about actually being able to make something useful, they just want patents to entrap people by insisting that the claims they write are "essential" to the practice of some "standard", if not their crappy Rambus standards then the standards of JEDEC or PCI-SIG or the IEEE would do just fine for their purposes. They want to sue, get in the way of progress and "tax the makers".

11.94+0.19(+1.62%)Oct 2 4:00 PMEDT