"The question of collusion was the first point of business for the jury. If the answer was no, then the case would be over after only an hour of deliberation.
The jury has obviously determined that collusion existed, price fixing occurred, and now on to the damages."
I wonder what part of this is not clear to some people on this board who are hell bent on MINDLESS arguments. They all need brain booster shots(shots = one is not enough) to increase their IQ above zero.