Now how the F do you know what a jury will do? You're an idiot. Stop guessing and stop posting garbage. After the 87 posts saying the same thing over and over, just make sure you don't run away when you're wrong.
How can you be sure that she is wrong? Were you an industry professional when RDRAM was introduced to the market and hyped to be soooooooooooo much better than SDRAM which it was supposed to replace, yet the latency and heat problems caused it to actually suck even worse? I worked for an OEM, I know how bad it sucked. How many industry pros testified that RDRAM was any good? That would be a big fat ZERO, yet there were engineers from Intel, Apple, and OEMs who testified about the suckiness.
RDRAM was all HYPE, get it? No, you wouldn't because why would people who work in the industry know any more than some casual investor who knows nothign about technology? Freaking stupid garbage failed on it's own, ok.. get that through your thick skull.
First of all, I'm not sure she is wrong. Just tired of all you idiots predicting what a jury will do. Second, I could care less if RMBS is frivolous, sleazy, and their products sucked. I'm here for 1 thing: To make money.... period. I have no emotional attachment to this case like you obviously do.
I'm just betting on what I think a jury will do and the subsequent effect it will have on the stock price. So save all the soapbox BS for the stupid investor who buys or sells based on emotion.
Wouldn't it be funny if some medical doctor who knows nothing about DRAM or SDRAM or even what "OEM" means makes a crap-load of money off this, and the rah-rah techy who knows everything is wrong?? You'd be standing on a ledge somewhere.
You keep on preaching til your blue in the face and I'm going to buy a boat.