Sun, Jan 25, 2015, 5:43 AM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Cisco Systems, Inc. Message Board

  • allnewquincymagoo9 allnewquincymagoo9 Feb 21, 2013 8:33 AM Flag

    What a NEOCON THINKS -vs- REALITY regarding Sequestration

     

    BYRON YORK, WASHINGTON EXAMINER: Good evening.

    VAN SUSTEREN: And we are approaching this March 1st date, but let me get something straight about sequestration, just so I understand. When we hit March 1st, if sequestration goes into effect, we're not cutting back, we're really talking about not spending as much as we thought we would, right?

    YORK: That's right. Sequestration is not an actual cut in government spending. It's not as if government spending is going to go down like that. It's actually going to go up. It's going to go up a little less quickly and a little less high than it would have without sequestration.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Then why in the world are people talking about things like pink slips for employees? Because it seems to me if we're not cutting, we're actually going up, just not as much as we thought we would, why would anyone even lose a job? Whey does anything -- why would our readiness be at risk in terms of the military? Why anything? I mean, we're right where we were.

    YORK: Well, there shouldn't be a lot of federal employees who do lose a job. There's a lot of talk about furloughs. We've talked about, for example, in the Defense Department, civilian employees being furloughed for 22 days in the next six months, which basically means they wouldn't work on Friday for the next six months.

    But in terms of people losing their jobs, you're talking about projections that each federal agency makes of how much they're going to spend over the next year, what it's going to cost them, what cost of living increases they're going to give their employees and all that, and they're going to have to cut back on that a little bit.

    VAN SUSTEREN: So if they didn't get raises, nobody'd get a pink slip or a furlough, essentially, right?

    YORK: You would think, yes.

    Sequestration could mean across-the-board pain

    comments
    35
    inShare
    More

    By
    Chip Reid

    Play CBS News Video
    Scroll Left Scroll Right

    2/20: Jesse Jackson Jr. pleads guilty; Library of Congress rescuing historyplay 2/20: Jesse Jackson Jr. pleads guilty; Library of Congress ...
    Mount Etna eruption lights up the skyplay Mount Etna eruption lights up the sky
    Kansas City explosion caught on tapeplay Kansas City explosion caught on tape
    2/19: Dorner targets share their stories; Iwo Jima sculpture up for auctionplay 2/19: Dorner targets share their stories; Iwo Jima sculpture ...
    Dorner targets share their storiesplay Dorner targets share their stories
    The power of a uniquely American songplay The power of a uniquely American song
    Maternity tourism catching on with Chinese mothersplay Maternity tourism catching on with Chinese mothers
    Was Adam Lanza competing with Anders Breivik?play Was Adam Lanza competing with Anders Breivik?
    Thieves steal $50m worth of gems in airport heistplay Thieves steal $50m worth of gems in airport heist
    Sequester cuts would be a "catastrophe" for DOD civiliansplay Sequester cuts would be a "catastrophe" for DOD civilians
    SEC freezes suspicious Heinz tradeplay SEC freezes suspicious Heinz trade
    Jesse Jackson Jr., wife plead guilty to conspiracyplay Jesse Jackson Jr., wife plead guilty to conspiracy

    (CBS News) WASHINGTON - The entire economy is headed for trouble in just eight days -- when massive across-the-board cuts in the federal budget are scheduled to kick in automatically. The cuts were designed to be so deep and harmful, that they would force the president and Congress to find a better way. But they haven't. Just for example, there would be $46 billion cut from the Defense Department and benefit cuts for 4.7 million long-term unemployed.

    The FBI says the budget cuts would require all employees, including special agents, to be furloughed for up to 14 days.

    Referring to the FBI's top managers, Jan Fedarcyk, the former head of the New York field office of the agency, said: "I'm sure they are most worried about, 'What does this mean in the national security arena?' That's probably at the top of the list, a discussion about maintaining our counter-terrorism operations."

    Watch CBS News correspondent David Martin's report on the impact the sequester cuts could have on those who work for the Department of Defense:

    Most of the cuts would not take effect immediately on March 1 -- they would be phased in slowly over several months. And they could be avoided if Congress and the president could agree to a deal. But if they can't, the cuts will be painful.

    Thousands of security screeners at the nation's airports would also be furloughed. Wait times at the busiest airports could increase by up to an hour.

    Boehner, WH trade blame for sequester
    Dickerson: Obama has stronger hand in sequester fight
    Will sequestration really be that bad?

    About 70,000 children would be dropped from Head Start.

    About 600,000 women and young children would be cut from a major nutrition program.

    Millions of the nation's long-term unemployed would lose an average of more than $400 in benefits.

    On the health front, the FDA says furloughs would result in 2,100 fewer inspections of food plants, increasing the risk of food-borne illness. And medical research could be cut by $1.6 billion, slowing progress in the fight against disease, including cancer and Alzheimer's.

    Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security would largely be spared. But critics of the whole process say that is a fundamental flaw because entitlement programs are a major driver of the national debt.

    This topic is deleted.
    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
 
CSCO
28.21-0.290(-1.02%)Jan 23 4:00 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.