Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

American International Group, Inc. Message Board

  • rogerabc100 rogerabc100 Oct 22, 2008 9:26 AM Flag

    WSJ ARTICLE SUGGESTS TO CHANGE AIG AGREEMENT (link)

    Plan B for AIG

    The federal bailout needs a private rescue.

    The survival of a great American business may now depend on whether private investors will be allowed to succeed where government seems to be failing. We're referring to insurance giant AIG, which under the terms of a federal bailout is threatening to become a loser for taxpayers. Maybe it's time for the feds to consider Plan B.

    With its September 16 rescue of the world's largest insurer, the New York Federal Reserve has managed to put taxpayers on the hook for more than $120 billion, but on terms so onerous that AIG may have to be sold in pieces at firesale prices. Most of the taxpayer exposure comes from an $85 billion revolving credit facility, in return for the government taking almost 80% of AIG's equity.
    Further Reading

    * Free AIG 10/02/2008 – The Fed takeover looks like an increasingly bad deal.
    * The Fed and AIG 09/18/08 – Nationalizations and the financial panic.

    The Feds are charging AIG more than 10% interest on the entire $85 billion, even if the company doesn't borrow that much. The interest rate on money actually borrowed is more than 14%. One AIG shareholder likens it to a financial counselor advising someone struggling to pay the 6% interest on his mortgage to solve the problem by running up debt on his credit card. That's why the New York Federal Reserve recently had to bail out the bailout, lending another $37.8 billion at more attractive terms.

    But the first transaction is still crushing the company, forcing a virtual liquidation. According to a source familiar with the company, AIG is suffering declines in renewals among corporate customers as it loses business to competitors. An AIG spokesman says, "Renewals worldwide are strong, but there are variations depending on the region and line of business." No one disputes, however, that interim CEO Ed Liddy's job is not so much to run the business as to prepare various AIG subsidiaries for quick and dirty sale, though there's no guarantee that the prices he gets will protect taxpayers from losses.

    We have little sympathy for a company that sought government assistance, except that in this case shareholders were never permitted to vote on the deal. The shareholder with the largest stake, former CEO Hank Greenberg, says the firm would have been better off in Chapter 11. AIG directors instead had every incentive to choose a transaction with the government -- even on horrible terms -- over bankruptcy. That's because a bankruptcy filing would have stripped directors of legal protection.

    Boris Feldman, an attorney at Wilson, Sonsini, tells clients who serve on boards to avoid bankruptcy at almost any cost, because in such scenarios "you have everyone coming at you." Directors, suddenly responsible for their own legal bills, can face suits from trustees, shareholders and bondholders. The only other clear winners in the September 16 deal, besides AIG directors, are the undisclosed counterparties in derivative transactions that the government protected from loss.

    There may be a better way. Mr. Greenberg has sketched out a proposal similar to the terms Treasury is now offering large banks -- nonvoting preferred stock for the government, with the company paying 5% to 6% and an option to buy out the government later with a premium for taxpayers. Though it's becoming known simply as the "Greenberg plan," the proposal appears to enjoy broad support among large AIG shareholders and, we suspect, employees as well. Other shareholders may have competing ideas that would leave the company healthy enough to ensure that taxpayers get their money back.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
 
AIG
58.32+0.57(+0.99%)May 27 4:00 PMEDT