Believes Company has Grossly Miscalculated Expectations for Met Coal Pricing Recovery and is Wholly Unprepared to Protect Stockholder Value
Audley Capital Advisors LLP (including certain related funds and investment vehicles, “Audley Capital”) today issued the following statement questioning Walter Energy, Inc.’s (NYSE: WLT) (TSX: WLT) (“Walter Energy” or “the Company”) argument regarding pricing improvements in the metallurgical coal (“met coal”) market. Audley Capital is continuing to urge stockholders to vote the GOLD proxy card for its five nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Company’s upcoming 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 25, 2013.
Julian Treger, Managing Partner of Audley Capital Advisors, said, “Over the past few weeks, including in its most recent letter to stockholders dated April 15, 2013, Walter Energy expressed optimism regarding improving conditions for met coal pricing. The Company has been pushing a plan that is entirely predicated on the recovery of met coal pricing in the very near future. We believe that demonstrates the lack of sophistication and thoughtful analysis by the current Board. The Board has claimed that met coal prices are at their trough, but as demonstrated by the downward pressure on met coal pricing and recently disclosed Chinese growth figures, there is a very real possibility that prices will fall further. Just yesterday, the impact on Walter Energy’s share price was significant, wiping off another $200 million of market capitalization to approximately $1.3 billion against a debt load of approximately $2.5 billion.”
Added Mr. Treger, “We believe that the current Board is ill-prepared to respond to continued price deterioration. Our analysis suggests that if met coal prices drop further, the Company could face a liquidity crisis in the foreseeable future and the Board would be forced to pursue financing that, given what we see as the Board’s lack of sophistication in the capital markets, could severely impact existing stockholders. We are concerned that the very directors that created Walter Energy’s leverage problem are ill-equipped to address the issue if met coal prices do not, as they wish, bail them out of the current situation.”
Mr. Treger concluded, “We have consistently called attention to the fact that there are options available to the Company that we think a skilled Board could pursue to manage price volatility and financing constraints. Our director nominees have proven their value in volatile and distressed situations. We believe that our Board nominees – both as a collective group and as individuals – are qualified to assist management to address issues of reducing balance sheet risk, seeking joint venture partners for projects, divesting underperforming and non-core assets, and upgrading existing reserves. We are convinced that Walter Energy is in need of real, credible, sophisticated new Board members to help restore confidence in the direction of the Company and address all possible scenarios facing the business, including falling met coal prices.”
Audley Capital notes that analysts are concerned about the Company’s prospects to increase equity value over the coming 12 to 24 months, and ability to react to a further deterioration in met coal pricing.