OK, I bit, I followed the link. They recommended shorting on Sept 28 because it dropped to 3.15 AH that day. The grounds were that executives were turfed and data was apparently suspect, and the prognosis that it was sure to drop below $1. Wow, they sure put a lot of DD behind it. The time to short was early 2009, say in February, when there were eyebrows raised with revised data and valid concerns about timeline and hurdles to commercialization. This site didn't even reference the ongoing saga. No credibility whatsoever, and I recommend never, ever investing short or long without some DD. I wonder how many people made money shorting based on their recommendation at 3.15.