Gramps. You are likely to lazy or afraid to find the truth. Instead you cut and paste from a Right Wing Nut site that has a history of cherry picking a story. If you believe what you wrote, you are either misinformed or intellectually lazy.
What a piece of work you are! Full of acquisations, hot air, and bull s**t about which you know absolutely nothing. WHAT DID I CUT AND PASTE? I posted a link since you demanded one. But no, that's not enough, even though they were the attributed source of the WND story that began this thread so that you could educate yourself by reviewing some of the actual documents that the FOI request turned up.
Are you actually going to tell me that snopes is an unbiased source? If that's what you think, then you exhibit no ability to evaluate anything. Almost all of the items they point out were from news articles in the LA Times, SF Examiner, etc. regarding a couple of press conferences that the queen held when this issue first came to light. Of couorse she's not going to stand there in front of reporters and say something like "yes, I did all those things and I can get away with it because I'm important". And of course, the reporters (who have no political bias) are going to dig any deeper. Not one of them, to my knowledge, files a FOI request.
You are definately not worth the time and effort to attemtp to carry on a civil conversation with or even waste my time on.