It is liberal assumption (and wrong) that most min wage people are struggling family men or women who are primary wage earners for the fam. In fact, only about 900,000 families are lifted out of pov by the proposed wage hike.
That is because most of the min wage people are second or third family workers (spouses earning a little extra) or teenagers.
But 500,000 jobs will be lost. How does that make a good tradeoff?
Thanks. The pig killing blood lust really got her going. I saw her at tennis Monday night and she wants to kill more pigs. She told everyone about it so they know we are "dating." Sort of spoils it for me with the other women in the group.
If a head of the household, and thereby a bit older, is making minimum wage, the first question to ask is what has this person done over the last 5-10 years to upgrade his/her skills? More education? More training? Why isn't this person a supervisor? I know this is a strange concept to liberals, but ya still gotta work to get ahead and work also means bettering yourself. Obama's answer to these issues is $10.10 per hour? That's about what he's worth.
Adds to inflation. Business owners will increase the price of their products in order
to pay higher minimum wages.
Remember the definition of poor is the inability to pay the asking price of products.
The poor get burned more by such socialism.
The poor won't get paid minimum wage.
Remember a lot of minimum wage jobs are entry level opportunities for
high school and college students. Not the head of a household.