This is the number of unique visitors. . .
Jan 1 ---111
Jan 2--- 164
Jan 3--- 131
Jan 4--- 140
Jan 5--- 95
Jan 6--- 119
Jan 7--- 79
Jan 8-- 108
Is Pomerantz really doing the shareholders a favor?
If you haven't seen why Judge McMahon did not consider Exhibit 20 or Exhibit 21 but said that this exonaraint evidence would be considered during discovery, then check Scribd. Exhibit 20 and 21 clearly show that Mr. #$%$ was only the legal representative for a short time and the shareholder was someone else.
You can also download the evidence from the SAIC website itself as the steps are there.
shows how many of us are watching this on a daily basis. also, if consensus among shareholders that are part of the class is that there is a lie at the core of the VVR report, then they should be directing the lawyers and not vice-a-versa. the company want to work on behalf of shareholders but it is hard when they are suing you regardless of merits and if they want to or not. shows that communication among shareholders can build synergy in the right direction. shows how many people would be notified of shareholder meeting. also shows the potential for a derivative class action against vvr, kerrisdale, prescience for false and defamatory statements.