The tenth evidence available so far showing LPH's legitimacy
The longer the CFO on the job, the better the chance showing LPH's legitimacy. If you were the CFO of a fraudulent company under the scrunity of SEC, would you like to resign as early as possible to avoid or lessen the potential legal suit? In contrast, Mr. Toups still holds the CFO position since the occurrence of the First Hit Piece, or January 3rd.
On the other hand, everyone on this Board recognizes how erroneous of GEO's and CCTV's Reports are. How come LPH management hasn't rebutted it at all. A logical thinking is the company is prohibited from defending itself during the investigation period.
he is trying to save himself but he will not because he is a fraudster. they are not prohibited from defending themselves. that is complete garbage. you give all these trash evidences but lph can not prove their financials. if you are innocent you do not hide your financials. no one prohibits you from defending yourselves.