Can anyone explain why she hasn't ruled yet on the Article 78 case?
Is this because she is waiting on Bransted ruling?
I agree it is frustrating. Maybe she doesn't want to rule in BAC favor (understanding the damage it would do to MBIA) and is holding off in hopes of a settlement. I believe the delay is intentional for some reason.
She thinks they will settle then she will not have to set a precedent setting ruling in my mind
Kapnick is a frigging disgrace to her profession. Not giving a ruling in 7 months is disgraceful.
A government employee who doesn't have a boss.