I'll have to take a look at that one Truth. Do you consider I or someone else, might go to the Yong board to see wass up, and low
and behold what do I see within 3 posts????, two of the same names I find here. Truth and Run. You
naughty boy. As for Morgan Stanley. They are in so much doo doo, I wouldn't be hyping their name, Declinations to Prosecute.
In his post the Professor notes that Peterson engaged in the following conduct:
•“Peterson and Chinese Official 1 had a close personal relationship before Peterson joined Morgan Stanley.”
•A shell company used to facilitate the scheme was owned 47% by Chinese Official 1 and 53% by Peterson and a Canadian Attorney.
•“Without the knowledge or consent of his superiors at Morgan Stanley, Peterson sought to compensate Chinese Official 1”
•“Peterson concealed Chinese Official 1’s personal investment [in certain properties] from Morgan Stanley”
•“Peterson used Morgan Stanley’s past, extensive due diligence [as to certain of the investment properties] to benefit his own interests and to act contrary to Morgan Stanley’s interests.”
oesn't represent a buying opportunity. Take this for instance:"
Really Truth, you have to keep up with the news. It's almost like Jin pumping Nomura, just to find
oopps, they sold their entire position and they also are not doing so good as an investment arm.
So many troubles in paradise, don't you think? But I will take a look at your other pick.