% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Augme Technologies, Inc. Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • biggergrove biggergrove Jun 13, 2012 8:03 PM Flag

    UPDATED Letter: Augme Technologies, Inc. v. Tacoda LLC

    Rowdy. The rest of the letter besides the typo is the same as presented on the IV board?

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Here is the point. Trial before the end of the year and seperate cases. Now AOL can go down three times.

      I can tell you that no other judge of this court has the power to order me to CONSOLIDATE any two cases on MY docket, and I can further advise you that I WILL NOT CONSOLIDATE the AOL case with Tacoda. Tacoda is going to be ready for trial at the end of this year and right now I have it down for trial just after Thanksgiving, with jury selection to occur immediately prior to Thanksgiving. Order your calendars accordingly. Whatever res judicata effects flow from my determination to try the Tacoda case now will happen.

      I will be getting back to you tomorrow with a final scheduling order, but rest assured that it will not be impacted in the slightest particular by the fate of the AOL case.

      • 2 Replies to xtj756666


        Unless there has been another delay by Tacoda/AOL, sfp is correct about tomorrow's meeting (initial conference). See below for more info:

        Here is the notice for the hearing from the docket:
        SECOND AMENDED CALENDAR NOTICE: Initial Conference set for 11/30/2007 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 21B, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Colleen McMahon. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/17/07) (tro) (Entered: 10/17/2007

        darn this judge only took 5years.... almost to the date to get something going.i hope she will not take another 5 years to finish the job.

      • it alamost seems like she is more mad at sweet.lets hope she stays fair and doesnt give AOL reasons for speedy appeals if they do not prevail in her court.

    • If it's legitimate...and the tone of it is decidedly's nice. However, it sort of just confirms what we already assumed would happen.

      I'd like to see the stock set a new 52 week high by going up rather than seeing the 52 wk low keep coming down to meet the whatever the current price is.

      Again, if we get a nice boost tomorrow it will merely confirm what many of us here have been saying for quite some time...good news on the legal front drives the price UP. Sadly, it seems whenever the management reports actual business results it drives the price DOWN.

      Let us all relax and see what the next couple days will bring. Much damage has been down lately. A nice boost might get us back to where we were 10 days ago.

      Hopefully this little release doesn't set the price up for another damaging dilution.